Gut bacteria determines social development? Psychobacteriomics?

The paper by Desbonnet and colleagues* (open-access) asks some intriguing questions about how our gut bacteria - those trillions of passengers which we all carry in our deepest, darkest recesses - might have the propensity to affect the behavioural development of a mouse specifically focused on social development.

Whilst to some people this might not sound like a particularly exciting finding, to others such a suggestion might potentially signal the start of a whole new way of looking at how our (human) physiology might actually impact on our psychological development. Move over Piaget et al and make way for something rather more complex. Even possibly a new -omic..... psychobacteriomics (you heard here first folks).

OK let's not get ahead of ourselves here. This was only a small study of germ-free (GF) and conventionally colonised (with bacteria) mice measuring their mouse-like behaviours across various 'sociability tests'. Mice are mice not humans and this finding needs replication.

That being said I'm interested. I'm interested whether these findings could be crossed over to other animals and even humans. I'm interested whether different bacteria might be linked to various aspects of social development. I'm interested whether this means that taking lots of antimicrobials during early infancy could affect social development. Indeed, I'm interested if this might have implications for the arguments: breast vs. bottle, c-section vs. natural birth, even whether supplementation with probiotics during critical stages of development might show some relationship to a person social development bearing in mind I'm not making any recommendations by the way.

And then there's conditions like autism to consider...

----------

* Desbonnet L. et al. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Molecular Psychiatry. May 2013.

----------

Akkermansia muci... muciniphila and diet induced obesity

It just rolls off the tongue: Akkermansia muciniphila*. 

As we speak A.muciniphila is making headlines across the world based on the study by Amandine Everard and colleagues** (open-access) on what happened to mice who had or were lacking in this stalwart of the gut microbiome.

No need for me to go into great detail about the Everard trial because (a) the paper is open-access and (b) it's already received plenty of coverage as per an entry in Nature (see here) and the National Geographic (see here).

The long-and-short of it (I should perhaps rename this blog with those words) was that A.muciniphila is, as it's name suggests, a bacteria with a connection to mucin; in particular it's love of the stuff. The finding: mice who were obese and diabetic (type 2 diabetes) seemed to have lower levels of A.muciniphila, and "that A. muciniphila treatment reversed high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders, including fat-mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia, adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance". The speculation is whether these mouse findings might, just might turn out to be something truly remarkable for humans presenting with similar symptoms.

But as with everything in life, things are rarely so simple. My first thought when I saw the name A.muciniphila were the intriguing findings reported by Lynne Wang and colleagues*** of lower numbers of A.muciniphila in fecal samples from children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder and their siblings. Just in case your interested, I talked about this paper on a post for a sibling blog. So unless we are talking about children with autism subsequently being a greater risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes, I would wager that there is more to A.muciniphila than just weight loss and insulin.

Leaky gut anyone?

----------

*  Derrien M. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. IJSEM. 2004; 54: 1469-1476.

** Everard A. et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. PNAS. May 2013.

*** Wang L. et al. Low Relative Abundances of the Mucolytic Bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium spp. in Feces of Children with Autism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77:  6718–6721.

----------

Innate immunity and the gut microbial ecosystem

A quick-ish post following the publication of a real fact-finding paper by Larsson and colleagues* (full-text). The aim of the paper was to map out how innate immunity intersects with microbial composition along the length of the gastrointestinal tract in a mouse model.

If you are slightly adverse to mouse research I'm afraid that you won't like this study much, which basically looked at bacterial composition in twelve segments of the mouse gut corresponding to the small intestine, cecum and large intestine correlated with several hundred/thousand genes regulated by the gut microbiota.

I won't lie to you in that this is quite a complicated study to follow. My Mr Men take on it suggested a few important findings were presented:

• In the small intestine, several thousand genes were regulated by bacterial microbiota. By comparison, fewer genes were regulated in the colon than other areas thought to be due to some shielding in that part of the gut from bacterial exposure.
• Depending on whether the authors looked at wild or germ-free mice, there were some interesting differences in different parts of the gut for genes related to lipid and fatty acid metabolism and nutrient absorption and metabolism. Genes governing cholesterol biosynthesis seemed to be top of the pile when it comes to being affected by microbiota as a function of whether or not there was a loss of innate immune signalling (Myd88-deficient). 
• When it came to gut barrier function along various stretches, gut bacteria had some ability to alter the expression of some important genes according to comparisons between germ-free and wide mice. 
• Myd88-deficient mice showed alterations in the types of bacteria present, some signs of disordered antimicrobial resistance as well as being potentially more susceptible to viral infections such as norovirus.

I can't possibly do justice to the amount of data presented in this paper. Extrapolating from the mouse model to humans, this data suggests that we have an extremely important symbiotic relationship going on in our deepest, darkest recesses. A relationship between self and bacteria; where genes and environment seem to play key roles in how we metabolise our food, how we regulate our ability to take on bacteria and viruses, and ultimately how our health in other organs might just want to make reference to the gut also.

* Larsson E. et al. Analysis of gut microbial regulation of host gene expression along the length of the gut and regulation of gut microbial ecology through MyD88. Gut. November 2011