The paper by Desbonnet and colleagues* (open-access) asks some intriguing questions about how our gut bacteria - those trillions of passengers which we all carry in our deepest, darkest recesses - might have the propensity to affect the behavioural development of a mouse specifically focused on social development.
Whilst to some people this might not sound like a particularly exciting finding, to others such a suggestion might potentially signal the start of a whole new way of looking at how our (human) physiology might actually impact on our psychological development. Move over Piaget et al and make way for something rather more complex. Even possibly a new -omic..... psychobacteriomics (you heard here first folks).
OK let's not get ahead of ourselves here. This was only a small study of germ-free (GF) and conventionally colonised (with bacteria) mice measuring their mouse-like behaviours across various 'sociability tests'. Mice are mice not humans and this finding needs replication.
That being said I'm interested. I'm interested whether these findings could be crossed over to other animals and even humans. I'm interested whether different bacteria might be linked to various aspects of social development. I'm interested whether this means that taking lots of antimicrobials during early infancy could affect social development. Indeed, I'm interested if this might have implications for the arguments: breast vs. bottle, c-section vs. natural birth, even whether supplementation with probiotics during critical stages of development might show some relationship to a person social development bearing in mind I'm not making any recommendations by the way.
And then there's conditions like autism to consider...
----------
* Desbonnet L. et al. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Molecular Psychiatry. May 2013.
----------
Showing posts with label autism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label autism. Show all posts
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
Akkermansia muci... muciniphila and diet induced obesity
It just rolls off the tongue: Akkermansia muciniphila*.
As we speak A.muciniphila is making headlines across the world based on the study by Amandine Everard and colleagues** (open-access) on what happened to mice who had or were lacking in this stalwart of the gut microbiome.
No need for me to go into great detail about the Everard trial because (a) the paper is open-access and (b) it's already received plenty of coverage as per an entry in Nature (see here) and the National Geographic (see here).
The long-and-short of it (I should perhaps rename this blog with those words) was that A.muciniphila is, as it's name suggests, a bacteria with a connection to mucin; in particular it's love of the stuff. The finding: mice who were obese and diabetic (type 2 diabetes) seemed to have lower levels of A.muciniphila, and "that A. muciniphila treatment reversed high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders, including fat-mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia, adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance". The speculation is whether these mouse findings might, just might turn out to be something truly remarkable for humans presenting with similar symptoms.
But as with everything in life, things are rarely so simple. My first thought when I saw the name A.muciniphila were the intriguing findings reported by Lynne Wang and colleagues*** of lower numbers of A.muciniphila in fecal samples from children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder and their siblings. Just in case your interested, I talked about this paper on a post for a sibling blog. So unless we are talking about children with autism subsequently being a greater risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes, I would wager that there is more to A.muciniphila than just weight loss and insulin.
Leaky gut anyone?
----------
* Derrien M. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. IJSEM. 2004; 54: 1469-1476.
** Everard A. et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. PNAS. May 2013.
*** Wang L. et al. Low Relative Abundances of the Mucolytic Bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium spp. in Feces of Children with Autism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77: 6718–6721.
----------
As we speak A.muciniphila is making headlines across the world based on the study by Amandine Everard and colleagues** (open-access) on what happened to mice who had or were lacking in this stalwart of the gut microbiome.
No need for me to go into great detail about the Everard trial because (a) the paper is open-access and (b) it's already received plenty of coverage as per an entry in Nature (see here) and the National Geographic (see here).
The long-and-short of it (I should perhaps rename this blog with those words) was that A.muciniphila is, as it's name suggests, a bacteria with a connection to mucin; in particular it's love of the stuff. The finding: mice who were obese and diabetic (type 2 diabetes) seemed to have lower levels of A.muciniphila, and "that A. muciniphila treatment reversed high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders, including fat-mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia, adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance". The speculation is whether these mouse findings might, just might turn out to be something truly remarkable for humans presenting with similar symptoms.
But as with everything in life, things are rarely so simple. My first thought when I saw the name A.muciniphila were the intriguing findings reported by Lynne Wang and colleagues*** of lower numbers of A.muciniphila in fecal samples from children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder and their siblings. Just in case your interested, I talked about this paper on a post for a sibling blog. So unless we are talking about children with autism subsequently being a greater risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes, I would wager that there is more to A.muciniphila than just weight loss and insulin.
Leaky gut anyone?
----------
* Derrien M. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. IJSEM. 2004; 54: 1469-1476.
** Everard A. et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. PNAS. May 2013.
*** Wang L. et al. Low Relative Abundances of the Mucolytic Bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium spp. in Feces of Children with Autism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77: 6718–6721.
----------
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Diagnosis by gut bacteria?
Please don't take the title of this post too literally. Sciences is only just beginning to unravel the first strands of the complicated universe that is our gut microbiota but two recent papers certainly do make for some interesting reading.
The first paper by Iebba and colleagues* provides quite a nice summary of where we stand (research-wise) with regards to different bacterial species seemingly predominating in different childhood conditions. The second paper by Jeffery and colleagues** details the intriguing possibility that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or some phenotypes of IBS based on the presence of functional bowel disturbances, might be classifiable by the predominating types of gut bacteria.
The Iebba paper was of double (triple) interest to me because it mentioned autism, coeliac disease (CD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the same sentence. In particular, the prevalence of Bacteroidetes alongside a parallel decrease of Firmicutes was a commonality between these three conditions; the first time I've seen a research group looking (bacterially) at these conditions together. I have to point out that autism is an extremely heterogeneous condition with quite a lot of scope for comorbidity; hence I am careful with any generalisations.
By contrast the Jeffery paper, although based on quite a small participant group, suggested quite a few things including that cluster analysis might be able to 'pick out' those cases of IBS associated with diarrhoea compared with those where constipation or alternating bowel habits were more common. Interestingly, their analysis also reported the opposite trend in terms of an increase of Firmicutes-associated taxa and a depletion of Bacteroidetes-related taxa in some of their participant cases. This alongside other related findings which perhaps indicate that the so-called 'leaky gut' (gut hyperpermeability) might also show some differences in terms of site when sub-categorising IBS on the basis of predominant functional bowel patterns.
Aside from factors such as different ages, different populations, different genders, et al, all of this makes me wonder about things like the immune system differences between conditions like IBD and CD compared with IBS. Indeed a few open questions: do the gut bacteria findings in autism perhaps reflect similar immune features to CD and IBD or is it all merely a coincidence? Is IBS an immune-mediated condition the same way as CD or IBD are or are other forces at work?
Without getting too Arthur C. Clarke, there are lots of potential possibilities to these collected works based on our individual and collected patterns of gut microbiota. Unlike fingerprints or retinal scans, gut bacteria is perhaps slightly more dynamic as a function of diet, environment, etc. and so is probably not going to be biometrically encoded onto your passport any time soon. Having said that, if the subtle differences between our gut bacteria might also be reflective of our condition or disease, this could potentially offer some quite startling insights into the way medicine diagnoses and also manages a wide variety of conditions.
Finally, this is probably my last post on this blog until the New Year. I would like to wish readers Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I raise a glass of water to your good digestive health over the holiday period!
* Iebba V. et al. Gut microbiota and pediatric disease. Digestive Diseases. December 2011.
** Jeffery IB. et al. An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota. Gut. December 2011.
The first paper by Iebba and colleagues* provides quite a nice summary of where we stand (research-wise) with regards to different bacterial species seemingly predominating in different childhood conditions. The second paper by Jeffery and colleagues** details the intriguing possibility that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or some phenotypes of IBS based on the presence of functional bowel disturbances, might be classifiable by the predominating types of gut bacteria.
The Iebba paper was of double (triple) interest to me because it mentioned autism, coeliac disease (CD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the same sentence. In particular, the prevalence of Bacteroidetes alongside a parallel decrease of Firmicutes was a commonality between these three conditions; the first time I've seen a research group looking (bacterially) at these conditions together. I have to point out that autism is an extremely heterogeneous condition with quite a lot of scope for comorbidity; hence I am careful with any generalisations.
By contrast the Jeffery paper, although based on quite a small participant group, suggested quite a few things including that cluster analysis might be able to 'pick out' those cases of IBS associated with diarrhoea compared with those where constipation or alternating bowel habits were more common. Interestingly, their analysis also reported the opposite trend in terms of an increase of Firmicutes-associated taxa and a depletion of Bacteroidetes-related taxa in some of their participant cases. This alongside other related findings which perhaps indicate that the so-called 'leaky gut' (gut hyperpermeability) might also show some differences in terms of site when sub-categorising IBS on the basis of predominant functional bowel patterns.
Aside from factors such as different ages, different populations, different genders, et al, all of this makes me wonder about things like the immune system differences between conditions like IBD and CD compared with IBS. Indeed a few open questions: do the gut bacteria findings in autism perhaps reflect similar immune features to CD and IBD or is it all merely a coincidence? Is IBS an immune-mediated condition the same way as CD or IBD are or are other forces at work?
Without getting too Arthur C. Clarke, there are lots of potential possibilities to these collected works based on our individual and collected patterns of gut microbiota. Unlike fingerprints or retinal scans, gut bacteria is perhaps slightly more dynamic as a function of diet, environment, etc. and so is probably not going to be biometrically encoded onto your passport any time soon. Having said that, if the subtle differences between our gut bacteria might also be reflective of our condition or disease, this could potentially offer some quite startling insights into the way medicine diagnoses and also manages a wide variety of conditions.
Finally, this is probably my last post on this blog until the New Year. I would like to wish readers Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I raise a glass of water to your good digestive health over the holiday period!
* Iebba V. et al. Gut microbiota and pediatric disease. Digestive Diseases. December 2011.
** Jeffery IB. et al. An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota. Gut. December 2011.
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Psychiatric comorbidity and coeliac disease
A short post this one following the recent publication of a paper by Danielle Arigo and colleagues* on the psychiatric comorbidity potentially accompanying a diagnosis of coeliac (celiac) disease (CD) in women. There is nothing particularly earth-shattering about the fact that people with coeliac disease or gluten sensitivity might be at greater risk of other comorbidities, particularly those based outside of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. If you don't believe me, check out the work of Drs Mario Hadjivassiliou and David Sanders for example and even the suggestion that parts of conditions such as autism and schizophrenia might manifest as a result of dietary gluten.
The Arigo study suggested that despite high compliance with a gluten-free diet, women diagnosed with coeliac disease (N=177) were still reporting symptoms for conditions like depression (37%) and 'disordered eating' (22%) (disordered eating I assume meaning a recognised eating disorder). Whilst the authors suggest that additional psychosocial care might be required for women with CD, I think that this study provides a small snapshot into a more a complex pattern of conditions which perhaps requires further exploration.
Depression for example has cropped up in other studies of CD. This paper suggested pretty much the same thing in gluten-free compliant children with CD and prominent 'internalising' symptoms particularly in females. So perhaps age is not the deciding factor here.
As for eating disorders and CD, you might expect that the adoption of a gluten-free diet might make a person more likely to concentrate on the food they eat, but would it necessarily promote an eating disorder? I find this a little hard to swallow but as yet can offer no other evidence-based explanation aside from the fact that this is again not the first time that an association has been made (see here). If I was to be ultra-speculative (careful!) I might go back to the autism connection, and the suggestion that there may be some overlap in the 'cognitive phenotype' between autism and eating disorders; could this possibly overlap with those 'best responder' cases to dietary intervention in autism spectrum conditions?
* Arigo D. et al. Psychiatric comorbidities in women with celiac disease. Chronic Illness. September 2011.
The Arigo study suggested that despite high compliance with a gluten-free diet, women diagnosed with coeliac disease (N=177) were still reporting symptoms for conditions like depression (37%) and 'disordered eating' (22%) (disordered eating I assume meaning a recognised eating disorder). Whilst the authors suggest that additional psychosocial care might be required for women with CD, I think that this study provides a small snapshot into a more a complex pattern of conditions which perhaps requires further exploration.
Depression for example has cropped up in other studies of CD. This paper suggested pretty much the same thing in gluten-free compliant children with CD and prominent 'internalising' symptoms particularly in females. So perhaps age is not the deciding factor here.
As for eating disorders and CD, you might expect that the adoption of a gluten-free diet might make a person more likely to concentrate on the food they eat, but would it necessarily promote an eating disorder? I find this a little hard to swallow but as yet can offer no other evidence-based explanation aside from the fact that this is again not the first time that an association has been made (see here). If I was to be ultra-speculative (careful!) I might go back to the autism connection, and the suggestion that there may be some overlap in the 'cognitive phenotype' between autism and eating disorders; could this possibly overlap with those 'best responder' cases to dietary intervention in autism spectrum conditions?
* Arigo D. et al. Psychiatric comorbidities in women with celiac disease. Chronic Illness. September 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)